Seasonal baselines for Australian beer production

Published by Rob J Hyndman and George Athanasopoulos / OTexts

This credits the original publisher. Better Loop membership or a shared assessment is not implied.

The public work

Using Australian quarterly beer-production data, the book compares mean, naïve, and seasonal-naïve forecasts against later observations. Its displayed example shows the seasonal baseline following the observed pattern more closely.

What to notice

Keep an interpretable seasonal baseline and a held-out period; complexity earns its place only when a fair comparison supports it.

Keep the context

One historical series and a displayed comparison. The illustration does not establish that seasonal-naïve forecasts are best for other products, horizons or changing market conditions.

AI use: Not reported in the source.

The inspected source does not report AI-assistant use by its authors.

A useful public example is not an assessment of a reader, a publisher or a Better Loop member.

Authored practice suggestion

Try the idea.
Check your own work.

Use material you are allowed to work with. This suggestion is preparation; it does not record a completed task or an improvement.

A prompt to adapt privately

Recreate the beer-production comparison using a local copy of the book’s data. Preserve the documented training cutoff and forecast horizon. Add an error table for the held-out observations, and explain how a different seasonal pattern could change the preferred baseline.

A check to adapt

No held-out values enter model fitting; all methods use the same horizon, dates and error definition; the seasonal lag is stated.

Open a related practice brief

Private practice needs no account. Your configured model provider may process the evidence you select.

See the full skill-to-sharing flow

Another way into the work.

Rolling market-exposure estimates with statsmodels

The notebook applies a 60-month rolling CAPM to technology-industry excess returns using Ken French’s factor and industry data. It displays coefficient tables, confidence-interval plots, and an expanding-window example.

Published bystatsmodels developers

Curated public exampleNotebook

Math & science

Partial pooling for Minnesota radon measurements

The notebook joins Minnesota household and county data, fits pooled, unpooled and hierarchical radon models, and displays posterior diagnostics and comparisons. The partial-pooling plots show how estimates change with county sample size.

Published byChris Fonnesbeck and contributors / PyMC

Curated public exampleGuide

Analysis & finance

Joining air-quality measurements to station metadata

The tutorial concatenates NO2 and particulate-measurement tables, shows row-count checks, and joins station coordinates and parameter descriptions. Displayed tables trace how the measurement dataset gains metadata.

Published bypandas documentation contributors